Democracy Docket
14 audits on the record
Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from Democracy Docket — not a verdict on it.
These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.
14audits citing this outlet
0carried a hard contradiction
9carried a framing split
11spans quoted
Quoted from this masthead
“The ruling was 6-1-2, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh writing a concurring opinion and Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissenting.”
September 16, 2026 · see it in context →“to use a flawed federal immigration database to initiate voter registration purges”
September 9, 2026 · see it in context →“The order granting the preliminary injunction also lifted the temporary restraining order Talwani had issued, making the DOJ's earlier appeals to the 1st Circuit Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court moot.”
September 5, 2026 · see it in context →“Talwani, who was nominated by former President Barack Obama, wrote Friday.”
September 5, 2026 · see it in context →“DOJ appeals court order temporarily blocking Trump's attack on mail voting”
August 30, 2026 · see it in context →“needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections”
August 25, 2026 · see it in context →“Printing costs alone could reach millions of dollars.”
August 25, 2026 · see it in context →“a sweeping voter suppression measure that the Senate has repeatedly refused to pass”
July 22, 2026 · see it in context →“Despite Republican control of the Senate, it is unlikely that Trump will see any version of SAVE enacted ahead of the midterms.”
July 22, 2026 · see it in context →“the U.S. House will pass the SAVE America Act, President Donald Trump's massive voter suppression bill”
July 21, 2026 · see it in context →“House Republicans are once again attempting to enact a version of President Donald Trump's long-sought SAVE America Act, a sweeping voter suppression measure that the Senate has repeatedly refused to pass.”
July 21, 2026 · see it in context →Audits citing Democracy Docket
- "7-2," "6-1-2," or Nothing at All: How the Press Counted a Supreme Court Order That Published No CountSeptember 16, 2026
- Missouri's top court found its secretary of state in contempt and cleared him the same afternoon, and every desk in the file agrees on exactly how that happened.September 12, 2026
- Eight newsrooms, one filing, and the only word they all agree on is the one inside the acronymSeptember 9, 2026
- Talwani Extends the Mail-Ballot Block Through the Midterms, and the Filing Chasing Her Grows StaleSeptember 5, 2026
- The Court Cleared Mail Voting for Trump and Then Hedged Its Own OrderAugust 25, 2026
- The Expert's Own Column Carried the Smaller Number. Fox's Interview With Him Did Not.August 15, 2026
- Voter Rules, $1.15 Trillion, and a Stock-Trading Ban: one House afternoonJuly 22, 2026
- 214-211 to Start Merging the SAVE Act Into the NDAA, Already Reported as DoneJuly 21, 2026
- Actively Reviving the Full SAVE Act Inside the Budget Bill, a Week After It DiedJuly 21, 2026
- The SAVE Act Heads to a Reconciliation Floor Vote, and Two Friendly Outlets DisagreeJuly 21, 2026
- The SAVE Act Fight Is Fake: Massie, and the week Senate conservatives said otherwiseJuly 21, 2026
- Remaking, Dismantling, or Integrity: Trump's whole-of-government election pushJuly 19, 2026
- Supports Its Core Tenets, Voting Against It: Murkowski on the SAVE ActJuly 19, 2026
- The Ossoff and Warnock Claim Traces to a Single Anonymous TweetJuly 14, 2026
Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.